Dear colleagues and friends,
This blog project is about sharing of knowledge, collaboration and getting your name out in the CG-Community as Corporate Governance is becoming an issue of global importance - particularly for international executives who move around the globe and do not always know what they are getting into when asked to accept a board or management position. The goal of this blog is intended to be both, an academic forum and a platform for the exchange of ideas, personal experiences and good thoughts - from professionals around the globe as well as executives and board members. I hope that all of you reading this blog will actively participate by placing comments and even consider writing an article once in a while. Please also tell your colleagues and friends who are engaged in Corporate Governance about this project and encourage them to make contributions as well.

Kindest regards

Peter H. Dehnen

P.S. Any suggestions as to making this blog better are always welcome.

Milestones of Corporate Governance in Ukraine

Introduction

In Ukraine only joint stock companies issue shares as securities. Other companies (for instance, LLCs or PLCs) cannot issue shares as securities. On 29 April 2009 the new Joint Stock Companies Law came into force providing two types of joint stock companies in Ukraine: public (that can have their shares listed at stock exchange) and private (their shares cannot be listed).
(more…)

Tagged with:
 

Corporate Governance in Canada

Introduction
Key issues in Canadian corporate governance are highlighted by the most recent case law on the tension between the directors’ duty to maximize the value of the corporation’s and the shareholders’ assets and their obligation to avoid eventual litigation. We begin by surveying the general principles of directors’ liability in the Canadian context, and then move on to illustrate a current topic of particular interest, which is the question of liability in the context of a change of control. (more…)

Tagged with:
 

Paraguay, long thought of a country of little corporate importance, is in fact coming into consideration for many business and commercial entrepreneurs thanks to the different advantages provided by the existing civil law system. (more…)

Tagged with:
 

The 2009 Act was signed into effect by the President on 12th July 2009. It introduces important governance changes for all companies and particularly for those companies licensed as banks. (more…)

Tagged with:
 

Italian Corporate Governance Criminal Law

Despite the great importance of groups of companies in modern economic society, the Italian legislator has refrained for decades from enacting specific norms disciplining such entities.
This is probably due to the fact the Italian legislator has for a long time considered the group as an economic institute rather than a judicial one.
Only in recent years, given the role attained by the corporate group in the Italian economy, has the lawmaker enacted norms explicitly referring to the group. (more…)

Tagged with:
 

Spain has, in the recent years, shyly embraced Corporate Governance initiatives.
The Spanish path on Corporate Governance, started with the publication of a report by the Círculo de Empresarios, a Spanish association of businessmen, on November 12th 1996. The report showed, by subject, a series of ideas and proposals for a better running of Boards of Directors. (more…)

Tagged with:
 

Corporate Systems in Romania

In view of joining the European Union on January 1st 2007, at the end of 2006 the Romanian Company Law was substantially reformed in order to introduce the principles of corporate governance.
This paper is aimed at providing a brief overview of the corporate system of the Romanian joint stock companies, substantially reorganized, in the light of the new applicable rules. (more…)

Tagged with:
 

Corporate Governance in Australia

Australia remains a country in which the courts are still a major determinant of the legal content of corporate governance standards. However, Australia has experienced a major shift in judicial philosophy over the last 20 years and that, in combination with the decline of the doctrine of precedent, has resulted in a very fluid set of judicially-determined corporate governance principles. (more…)

Tagged with: